[smc-discuss] Best practice for supporting alternative rendering of glyphs: ന്റ & റ്റ

[Santhosh Thottingal]

On Tuesday, March 18, 2014, Baiju M <baiju.m.mail at gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree.  My use case is for re-printing old books printed in this format.


If the use case is visually present all stacked nta as nonstacked nta, and
that output is not for further machine consumption, why not replace all ന്റ
with ന്‍റ,  similarly all റ്റ with ററ and print? Or even have a local font
with this modification- ന്റ glyph modified with ന്‍റ and റ്റ with ററ? If
this is enough, I can create that custom font for this purpose. Contact
offline if required.

Santhosh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.smc.org.in/pipermail/discuss-smc.org.in/attachments/20140318/4f5b1c34/attachment-0003.htm>