[smc-discuss] Best practice for supporting alternative rendering of glyphs: ന്റ & റ്റ

[Baiju M]

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Santhosh Thottingal
<santhosh.thottingal at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, March 18, 2014, Baiju M <baiju.m.mail at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I agree.  My use case is for re-printing old books printed in this format.
>
>
> If the use case is visually present all stacked nta as nonstacked nta, and
> that output is not for further machine consumption, why not replace all ന്റ
> with ന്‍റ,  similarly all റ്റ with ററ and print? Or even have a local font
> with this modification- ന്റ glyph modified with ന്‍റ and റ്റ with ററ? If
> this is enough, I can create that custom font for this purpose. Contact
> offline if required.

I will go for local font with these modifications.  Thanks for the offer :)

Regards,
Baiju M